CORE 11-26-2012
·
John
provided a site plan for consideration.
o Kathy considered
the implications of path and snow. Mentioned the effect that
pedestrians have on slowing traffic. Suggested minimizing the paths other
than what's already paved within the lot. And then the connection to the
main building would be the only additional path.
o Kate felt the staff
would want to be closer to the main building, and that we don't need to specify who can park where.
o Kate further felt
the maintenance & storage shed was redundant.
o Also, the staging
and storage area could be removed (it's redundant) and that would move the
parking out of the buffer area of the wetlands.
·
John
indicated that would be great to have something for Peter L before the day is
out.
o Still no word from
Peter and Andres. They know that they are supposed to be working
together. Stay tuned….
·
The
Mad River Path: Do we want it in the middle of campus or do we want it
separate?
o Kate had met with
Will Flender and they worked out a proposed alignment.
o Question: Do we
want to keep MRP traffic on the edge of the campus or right in the mix?
o Consensus seemed to
arrive around the path alignment along the edge of the pond.
·
Resolved:
o Enlarge
the building envelope for the western building at the entry to the pedestrian
campus.
o Tighten
up the parking area, eliminate the staging area, eliminate the extra building,
make it parking (not staff parking), change "maintenance &
delivery" to vehicle "maintenance and charging"
o Enlarge
envelope around uphill walking axis to accommodate unknown terminus conditions.
o JBC
to speak with Peter L to see when the drawings will be ready and then will set
up the next meeting.
No comments:
Post a Comment