Showing posts with label core team. Show all posts
Showing posts with label core team. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Master Planning Update 07.25.12

The Core Team has been busy at work the past six months preparing for a second presentation to the Waitsfield Development Review Board (DRB) on Tuesday, July 24, 2012. This meeting is a follow-up to the January 24, 2012 meeting in which Yestermorrow presented to the DRB a sketch plan for adaptive redevelopment (minutes from this meeting can be found here: January 24, 2012 DRB Meeting Minutes). The DRB offered feedback on the sketch plan, tasking the team with several items that helped guide the next stage of design development. Efforts to prepare for the meeting focused on the topics listed below.

Slope and Sunlight Analysis: The initial master plan included many smaller buildings at the base of the slope. A closer slope analysis revealed the steepness of the lower portion of the hill, which resulted in recommendations to move the buildings down slope to limit disturbance to the hillside. A corresponding sun study showing exposure in various seasons and times throughout the day affirmed the best areas for siting buildings to permit natural lighting and solar heat gain.  As a result, proposed buildings have been shifted to the west, away from the shade of the hillside, in an effort to capture additional solar gain.

ACT 250 9(b) Initial Permit Submittal: The team conducted an initial analysis of on-site soils in an effort to gain a preliminary understanding of whether or not agriculturally sensitive soils exist on site. It was discovered, in fact, that the meadow on the southern portion of the Yestermorrow campus is designated by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) as prime agricultural soils. The new entry driveway is proposed to enter the site at the campus’ southernmost tip, running along the base of the southeastern slope, slightly weaving in and out of the prime agricultural lands. This location was chosen due to the need to avoid the Class II and III wetlands and to redirect traffic from the center of the campus to the edge to encourage a more open and pedestrian-friendly feel to the landscape. As per ACT 250, prime agricultural lands shall not be developed unless a plan for mitigation of conservation lands is adopted; therefore, Yestermorrow proposes an on-site mitigation plan by designating the remainder of the meadow as agricultural lands for food production by Yestermorrow (for on-site kitchen use) or Kingsbury Market Garden/Vermont Foodbank.  Two representatives from ACT 250 visited Yestermorrow on July 25, 2012 to conduct a site analysis. They will be researching prior ACT 250 permits and will provide us with an update as soon as they gather a better understanding of past uses of the land.

Building Design Guidelines: A set of design guidelines was drafted by the Core Team and the Design Amigos to help guide the future master planning design and build process. Since one of the overarching goals of the master plan is to engage students in the design and building of elements of the master plan, Yestermorrow is seeking initial approval from the DRB on overarching design guidelines so that each time a design/build project is proposed for a building or site feature, Yestermorrow would only need to receive administrative approval rather than going through the long and arduous process of a complete zoning permit. These building guidelines would support the overarching goals to improve student experience, demonstrate regenerative design principles that improve the site from the perspective of natural systems, the students and supporters, as well as the local community, while also meeting the requirements of Waitsfield’s Adaptive Redevelopment Overlay District (AROD). 

The guidelines include details on the following principle categories:  Building Footprint, Building Height, Building Square Footage, Building Uses, Architectural Themes, Existing Structures, Materials Palette, Screening, Accessibility and Safety, Stormwater Management, and Parking.

Forest Management Plan: Fountains Forestry was hired by Yestermorrow as a consultant to prepare a Forestry Management Plan for the campus. The Management Plan will be based on a systematic inventory of the forest and Yestermorrow’s objectives, and will consider all significant resources. The plan may delineate areas to be managed for timber, and areas to be put to other uses such as residences, wildlife habitat, ecological or recreational activities. Preserving forestry potential on the property is an important element of the master planning process, as Yestermorrow teaches sustainable forestry techniques through demonstration small-scale logging practices on-site. The amount of clearing proposed in the School’s master plan will provide demonstration opportunities that will promote educational opportunities while not interfering with future forestry operations. A kickoff meeting and initial site analysis was conducted by Fountains Forestry, and a Plan is expected to be completed and presented to Yestermorrow within the next month.

Wetlands and Stormwater: An analysis of existing wetlands and associated setbacks revealed to the team that the majority of the northern portion of the site is made up of Class II and III wetlands that require a 50’ buffer. Additionally, the team is working with Watershed Consulting of Waitsfield to come up with 3 concept designs for how to daylight the existing culvert which runs from the waterfall to the new stormwater pond on the north edge of campus.  While currently the water flows through a culvert there are no setbacks, but we anticipate that once the stream is naturalized we will need a 50’ setback from development on each side of the stream.

Wastewater:  A task team was convened to discuss various options for wastewater treatment on-site.  The basic strategy is to create a series of smaller treatment systems as the phases are developed versus one large traditional septic system. The team feels confident that there is plenty of area available on the site for septic capacity. In addition to the previously permitted “upper meadow”, we dug test pits in the current dirt parking lot to determine whether those soils could also potentially be used for wastewater distribution.  Tests were positive for well-drained soils so that allows us even more flexibility in the siting of wastewater systems. 

Next Steps: The DRB reviewed these efforts and a preliminary master plan, and has requested additional feedback on specific items, which are to be presented at the next meeting on August 14, 2012.  These items include a more detailed landscape plan, more specific design guidelines, proposed reuse plans for the existing main campus building, and additional plans which better demonstrate the planned phases over time.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Minutes 2.27.12

02.27.12 Core Team Meeting
Present: Kinny Perot, Robin Morris, Kate Stephenson, Kathy Meyer, Abby Martin, Peter Lazorchak, Tony Stout, Andres Torizzo

First we reviewed Andres and Tony's work to date, including the watershed maps they created delineating three different sub-watersheds on the property and where they drain under Rte 100. It shows the current long culvert (dotted green line) and their best guess as to where a more natural water path would go (blue arrow on the map). We also discussed that the existing culvert continues from our property onto our neighbor's property (to the north) and that we should probably initiate a conversation with them regarding our plans for changing the water flow.
Overall Watershed Context (aerial photo w/ contours)
Site Watershed (zoom)

Tony also showed us another iteration where he had shaded in the various setbacks to the site: 200' from centerline of Rte 100, 75' from each property boundary, 50' wetland buffer, stream setbacks (100' on the steep slope sections and 50' on the flatter sections where the existing culvert runs) and identified ag soils and existing ag land. He also noted that all the forested area is considered a deer yard according to Fish and Wildlife mapping and it's possible that they could require a buffer as well.
Site Watershed with setbacks

We discussed the need to have additional wetland mapping done for the wet area to the south of the Chalet and tennis courts. By determining whether this is Class II or Class III wetland, it will inform us as to the necessary buffers (50' for II, 25' for III). Also if the disturbance to the wetland is under 3000 s.f. then we would not need a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers. Peter has a new colleague in his office who is a wetland mapping specialist however given the recent snow he was not sure she would be able to make the determination immediately. Most definitely either way the wetland location will impact the proposed entrance driveway location.

Then we reviewed two drawings from Peter Lazorchak's team. One shows the whole site and identifies all steep slopes with grade higher than 25% (these are the shaded parts). The other zooms in to the developed area and has all of the buildings and infrastructure from the Regenesis plan added in to the existing topography from our latest surveys. Peter's plan also incorporated some of the setback lines, including an assumed 50' wetland buffer and stream setbacks at 100' (upper stream) and 50' (lower section currently in culvert). He also brought up the issue of wastewater setbacks. While he is very supportive of alternative wastewater treatment and using constructed wetlands he feels strongly that the state will still require us to have in ground dispersal (leach fields). The leach field needs to be at least 30' downhill from any buildings and 75' uphill from any buildings. This means that the "upper meadow" area available for leach field would be significantly limited. We discussed potential other areas on the plan that might be considered for leach field beyond the previously permitted meadow.
02.21.12 Site plan w/ proposed buildings (whole site)
02.21.12 Site plan w/ proposed buildings (zoom)

We discussed how before Andres and Tony move forward with their 3 concept designs for stormwater, the Core Team needs to do a review of the proposed building locations to "massage" it in response to what we now know about setbacks.

Next steps:
  • Andres and Tony to look more closely at our existing Act 250 permit for references to habitat and ag soils
  • Peter to follow up with his colleague Kristin re: scheduling wetlands mapping
  • Core Team to meet Thursday March 1 at 8am (at Kinny's) to review findings and next steps
  • Core Team will follow up with Andres and Tony when we have a better sense of what buildings would move before they move forward with three concept designs.